Thursday, January 25, 2018

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—January 25, 2018

Written by M. Sean High—Staff Attorney
                 
The following information is an update of recent local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to agriculture:

WOTUS: U.S. Supreme Court Decides Jurisdiction for WOTUS Challenges
On January 22, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) determined that legal challenges to the “waters of the United States” (WOTUS) rule are to be brought first at the federal district court level (National Assn. of Mfrs. v. Department of Defense No. 16-299).  After the WOTUS rule was promulgated in November 2015, several parties brought actions challenging the rule simultaneously in both federal district courts and federal courts of appeals.  Ultimately, numerous federal court appeals actions were consolidated and transferred to the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.  According to SCOTUS, challenges to the WOTUS rule do not fall under the scope of those Clean Water Act challenges afforded direct and exclusive review in federal courts of appeals.  As a result, SCOTUS held that the Sixth Circuit lacked jurisdiction because challenges to the WOTUS rule must be reviewed initially in the federal district courts.

Food Safety: USDA-FSIS Announces Proposed Swine Inspection Rule
On January 19, 2018, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) announced a proposed amendment to the federal meat inspection regulations for hog slaughter establishments.  Specifically, USDA-FSIS is seeking “to establish a new voluntary inspection system for market hog slaughter establishments called the New Swine Slaughter Inspection System (NSIS), while also requiring additional pathogen sampling for all swine slaughter establishments.” Following future publication in the Federal Register, USDA-FSIS will receive public comment on the proposed rule for 60 days.

FSMA: FDA Releases Draft Guidance on Hazard Analysis and Risk-Based Preventive Controls for Animal Food
On January 23, 2018, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published notice in the Federal Register of the availability of draft guidance entitled: Hazard Analysis and Risk-Based Preventive Controls for Food for Animals (83 FR 3163).  Promulgated under the Food Safety Modernization Act, the draft guidance “is intended to explain how to comply with the requirements for hazard analysis and risk-based preventive controls for food for animals.”  According to FDA, the draft guidance addresses the following areas: (1) food safety plans; (2) conducting a hazard analysis; (3) hazards associated with the manufacturing, processing, packing, and holding of animal food; (4) preventive controls; and (5) preventive control management components.

FSMA: FDA Releases Five New FSMA Guidance Documents for Importers and Food Producers
On January 24, 2018, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced the availability of five guidance documents intended to assist importers and food producers comply with the Food Safety Modernization Act.  According to FDA, the guidance documents include the following: (1) draft guidance on the Foreign Supplier Verification Program (FSVP) rule; (2) a FSVP rule small entity compliance guide; (3) draft guidance on the term “Same Level of Public Health Protection” used in both the FSVP and Produce Safety regulations; (4) Chapter 15 of the draft Preventive Controls for Human Food guidance regarding supply-chain requirements; and (5) enforcement discretion guidance regarding the application of FSVP to certain importers of grain raw agricultural commodities.

National Organic Program: USDA Proposes Changes to the National List of Allowed and Prohibited Substances
On January 17, 2018 the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Agriculture Marketing Service (AMS) published notice in the Federal Register of a proposed rule to amend USDA’s organic regulations through changes to the National List of Allowed and Prohibited Substances (National List) (83 FR 2498).  First, the proposed rule would alter use restrictions for seventeen substances currently allowed for organic production or handling on the National List.  Second the proposed rule would add sixteen new substances on the National List to be allowed in organic production or handling.  Third, the proposed rule would list the botanical pesticide, rotenone, as a prohibited substance in organic crop production.  Finally, the proposed rule would remove ivermectin as an allowed parasiticide for use in organic livestock production.

International Trade: U.S. Wins WTO Broiler Chicken Dispute with China
On January 18, 2018, Reuters reported that the World Trade Organization (WTO) ruled in favor of the United States regarding China’s failure to adequately lower tariffs on U.S. broiler chicken products.  According to Reuters, in 2011, the WTO issued a ruling that China had improperly imposed anti-dumping duties on U.S. broiler chicken products.  Though China subsequently lowered these tariffs, in 2016, U.S. officials returned to the WTO asserting that China “had not done enough to comply” with the WTO ruling.  According to Reuters, the U.S. alleged that through China’s noncompliance, “U.S. poultry producers such as Tyson Foods Inc and Pilgrim’s Pride Corp had lost sales of over $1 billion.” Under the latest WTO ruling, unless an appeal is filed, China will have 20 days to lower its tariffs on U.S. broiler chicken products.

Pennsylvania Actions and Notices:
Department of Environmental Protection


AgLaw HotLinks:

     
Follow us on Twitter at PSU Ag & Shale Law (@AgShaleLaw) to receive daily AgLaw HotLinks.

Connect with us on Facebook to view our weekly CASL Ledger detailing Center publications and activities.

Listen to our weekly Agricultural Law Podcast.

Stay informed with our monthly Agricultural Law Brief newsletter.  


Visit The Ag & Food Law Blog for a comprehensive summary of daily judicial, legislative, and regulatory developments in agriculture and food.

Thursday, January 18, 2018

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—January 18, 2018

Written by M. Sean High—Staff Attorney
                 
The following information is an update of recent local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to agriculture:

Nutrient Management: Pennsylvania Court Finds Local Ordinance Not Preempted by State's Nutrient Management Act
On January 4, 2018, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania determined that the Montour Township Zoning Hearing Board (ZHB) erred in granting an application for a proposed swine facility because the township’s ordinance was not preempted by the Pennsylvania Nutrient Management Act (NMA) (Berner v. Montour Twp., Pa. Commw. Ct. No. 448 C.D. 2017).  According to the court, the NMA regulation cited by the ZHB as preempting the township ordinance “applies only to new manure storage facilities that are constructed as part of a plan developed for an NMP [Nutrient Management Plan] operation.” The court stated that because the proposed swine facility did not require an NMP, the cited NMA regulation did not apply.  As a result, the court held that the Applicant should not have been excused from “the zoning ordinance’s requirement that Applicant[s] submit facility designs and legally binding assurances with performance guarantees that demonstrate that all facilities necessary for manure management will be conducted without adverse impact on adjacent properties.”

Food Safety: USDA-FSIS Announces Proposed Changes to Egg Products Inspection Regulations
On January 9, 2017, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) announced that the agency is planning to amend the egg products inspection regulations regarding official plants that process egg products.  Under the proposed changes, official plants that process egg products will be required to develop Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points systems and Sanitation Standard Operating Procedures that are consistent with the meat and poultry regulations. According to USDA-FSIS, the purpose of the new regulations is to produce egg products that are free of detectable pathogens.  Following future publication of the proposed changes in the Federal Register, USDA-FSIS stated that it will accept public comments for 120 days.

Marketing Programs: California Milk Producers Vote in Favor of Quota Implementation Plan
On January 5, 2018, the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) published the results of the state’s Market Milk Producer Referendum regarding whether a proposed Quota Implementation Plan (QIP) would become effective if a Federal Milk Marketing Order (FMMO) is promulgated in California.  Of those producers voting in the referendum, 90.65% voted in favor of the proposed QIP.  As a result of the vote, if a FMMO is promulgated in California, the QIP will be enacted.

Industrial Hemp: Kentucky Approves 225 Applications for Industrial Hemp Research in 2018
On January 10, 2018, the North Kentucky Tribune reported that the Kentucky Department of Agriculture (KDA) has approved 225 applications to grow a total of 12,018 acres of industrial hemp for research purposes in 2018.  According to the report, the approved acreage amount is in addition to the 681,000 square feet of greenhouse space approved by KDA for indoor cultivation in 2018.  Kentucky Agriculture Commissioner Ryan Quarles asserted that because of the state’s industrial hemp research efforts, he is “more optimistic than ever that we can put industrial hemp on a path to widespread commercialization once Congress removes it from the federal list of controlled substances.”

Pennsylvania Legislation:
Environmental Resources and Energy (H)
  • HB 2004 Legislation providing for erosion & sedimentation agreements between DEP and County Conservation Districts (Referred to committee January 9, 2018)


Pennsylvania Actions and Notices:
Executive Orders


Department of Conservation and Natural Resources


AgLaw HotLinks:

     
Follow us on Twitter at PSU Ag & Shale Law (@AgShaleLaw) to receive daily AgLaw HotLinks.

Connect with us on Facebook to view our weekly CASL Ledger detailing Center publications and activities.

Listen to our weekly Agricultural Law Podcast.

Stay informed with our monthly Agricultural Law Brief newsletter.  


Visit The Ag & Food Law Blog for a comprehensive summary of daily judicial, legislative, and regulatory developments in agriculture and food.

Thursday, January 11, 2018

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—January 11, 2018

Written by M. Sean High—Staff Attorney
                 
The following information is an update of recent local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to agriculture:

Ag-Gag: Ninth Circuit Finds Idaho Farm Protection Law Violates First Amendment
On January 4, 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a ruling regarding the Constitutionality of Idaho’s Interference with Agricultural Production law (IWAP).  Known also Idaho Code § 18-7042, IWAP was enacted in 2014 after an undercover video recording at an Idaho dairy facility was posted on the internet.  Under IWAP, Idaho sought to criminalize: (1) the use of a misrepresentation to gain access to an agricultural operation and (2) any video and/or audio recordings of an agricultural operation without the owner’s consent.  The court held that Idaho’s criminalizing misrepresentations to gain access was a violation of the First Amendment because IWAP “criminalized innocent behavior, was staggeringly overbroad, and that the purpose of the statute was, in large part, targeted at speech and investigative journalists.” The court also held that IWAP’s ban on video and/or audio recordings “regulated speech protected by the First Amendment and was a classic example of a content-based restriction that could not survive strict scrutiny.”

Antitrust:  R-CALF USA Alleges Potential Antitrust Violation
On January 3, 2018, the Ranchers-Cattlemen Action Legal Fund, United Stockgrowers of America (R-CALF USA) issued letters to leaders of the U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary, and its Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy, and Consumer Rights alleging potential antitrust violations by the food processors JBS and Cargill.  R-CALF USA stated that the JBS-owned beef packing plant in Souderton, Pennsylvania, and the Cargill-owned beef-packing plant in Wyalusing, Pennsylvania, “are the major beef packing plants in Pennsylvania, and likely throughout the entire Northeast.” According to R-CALF USA, following the October 25, 2017, temporary delisting of the JBS-owned plant in Souderton due to pest control, cow prices fell $5 to $10 per cwt.  R-CALF USA alleged that during this market downturn, Cargill purchased cattle at artificially low prices “because there was no meaningful market competition.”  Accordingly, R-CALF USA seeks Senate investigation into whether actions surrounding JBS’ withdrawing from the market and Cargill’s purchasing practices violated U.S. antitrust laws.

Pesticides: Attorneys General Join Challenge to California Glyphosate Labeling Law
On January 4, 2018, The Progressive Farmer reported that attorneys general from eleven states have joined a legal challenge in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California seeking to block California Prop 65.  Under Prop 65, products that contain glyphosate must carry a label stating that glyphosate may cause cancer.  The eleven states filing the petition are Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Missouri, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota and Wisconsin.   

FSMA: FDA to Not Enforce Certain FSMA Regulations during Discretion Period
On January 4, 2018, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced that during the enforcement discretion period of the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA), the agency will not enforce certain regulations.  FDA stated that the enforcement delay will allow the agency additional time to address concerns regarding the regulations. According to FDA, areas covered under this enforcement discretion include:

  • “facilities that would be farms except for certain factors and activities,
  • written assurances provisions in all four rules related to the control of identified hazards or microorganisms that are a potential risk to public health
  • the animal food preventive controls requirements for certain manufacturing/processingactivities performed on human food by-products used as animal food, and
  • Foreign Supplier Verification Programs rule requirements for importers of food contact substances.” 

International Trade: U.S. Hopes U.K. Drops Certain EU Farming and Food Rules Following Brexit
On January 4, 2018, Bloomberg reported that United States (U.S.) officials are hopeful that the United Kingdom (U.K.) will eliminate some of its farming and food rules now that the nation has decided to leave the European Union (EU).  According to Ted McKinney, undersecretary for trade at the U.S. Department of Agriculture, following Brexit, the U.S. would like the U.K. to develop “its own food safety and environmental safety protocols” and remove certain EU farming and food processing regulations.  McKinney stated that the EU can be a “difficult place to do business” and that if certain EU regulations are dropped “there is a much greater opportunity for trade between the U.K. and U.S.” 


AgLaw HotLinks:


Listen to our new Agricultural Law Podcast by clicking here!

Follow us on Twitter at PSU Ag & Shale Law (@AgShaleLaw) to receive AgLaw HotLinks

Connect with us on Facebook! Every week we will post the CASL Ledger which details all our publications and activities from the week.

Stay informed with our monthly Agricultural Law Brief located here.


For a comprehensive summary of daily judicial, legislative, and regulatory developments in agriculture and food, visit The Ag & Food Law Blog.

Thursday, January 4, 2018

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—January 4, 2018


Written by M. Sean High—Staff Attorney
                 
The following information is an update of recent local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to agriculture:

Avian Influenza: APHIS Proposes Change to Avian Influenza Virus Elimination Payments for Floor-Raised Meat Poultry
On December 21, 2017, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Animal Plant and Health Inspection Service (APHIS) announced a proposed change to the flat rate calculation for floor-raised meat poultry eliminated after a notifiable detection of avian influenza.  Accordingly, APHIS is proposing a flat rate payment for all floor-raised meat poultry facilities that will be based on a calculation of a facility’s square footage.  The change would replace the current flat rate which is based on a calculation of number of birds.  APHIS will accept comment on the proposed elimination rate change until January 12, 2017. 

Animal Welfare: New York Town Rejects Animal Welfare Ordinance
On December 11, 2017, the Post Star reported that the Town Board of Fort Ann, New York rejected a local ordinance designed to “provide animal control, safety and welfare, not provided by the Agriculture and Market Law of the State of New York.” The defeated ordinance would have: (1) forbidden livestock on less than one acre, (2) required “adequate shelter” of livestock, (3) required an “adequate corral” for livestock, (4) required removal of manure in a specified manner, and (5) required owners to maintain control of all livestock.  The report stated that the ordinance had been proposed by a deputy supervisor engaged in a personal dispute involving the alleged contamination of the official’s well water from a neighbor’s livestock.

Animal Feed: EU to Ban Formaldehyde in Poultry Feed
On December 22, 2017, Poultry World reported that the European Union (EU) voted to deny the reauthorization of formaldehyde as an approved additive to poultry feed.  According to the report, the decision follows actions by certain EU countries to forbid the use of formaldehyde in poultry feed over concerns that the chemical may be carcinogenic and potentially harmful to workers.  The E.U. vote was made despite an assertion by the European Food Safety Authority that formaldehyde as a feed additive does not cause cancer, does not present health risks to consumer, and is safe to workers if protective measures are taken. 

International Trade: APHIS Issues Statement on Requirements for U.S. Soybean Exports to China
On December 27, 2017, U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) issued a statement informing U.S. soybean farmers and exporters about China’s new phytosanitary import requirements.  APHIS stated that the new procedure, which went into effect on January 1, 2018, applies to bulk and container shipments of raw, unprocessed soybeans.  Accordingly, APHIS must now notifying China when a soybean shipment exceeds 1 percent foreign material by placing an additional declaration on the phytosanitary certificate.  APHIS asserted that the notification is necessary to allow the continuation of U.S. soybean exports into China until the U.S. is able to implement measures that “reduce the volume of foreign material and weed seeds in soybean shipments to China.”  APHIS anticipates that these measures will be implemented sometime during the 2018 crop year.

Pennsylvania Legislation
Agriculture and Rural Affairs (H)
  • Informational meeting with the Pennsylvania Secretary of Agriculture (Scheduled for January 9, 2018)
  • HB 1989 Legislation providing for the labeling of pesticide information (Referred to committee December 29, 2017)


Environmental Resources and Energy (H)
  • HB 1980 Legislation to ensure that local governments uphold the “10 acre exemption” to the Pennsylvania Sewage Facilities Act (Referred to committee December 21, 2017)


Pennsylvania Actions and Notices
Department of Agriculture


State Conservation Commission


AgLaw HotLinks:


Listen to our new Agricultural Law Podcast by clicking here!

Follow us on Twitter at PSU Ag & Shale Law (@AgShaleLaw) to receive AgLaw HotLinks

Connect with us on Facebook! Every week we will post the CASL Ledger which details all our publications and activities from the week.

Stay informed with our monthly Agricultural Law Brief located here.


For a comprehensive summary of daily judicial, legislative, and regulatory developments in agriculture and food, visit The Ag & Food Law Blog.