The Pregnant Pig Amendment (Article
X, section 21 of the Florida Constitution) was enacted in 2008 after voters
approved the Amendment in 2002. The Amendment makes it illegal to confine a pig
during pregnancy in an enclosure, or tether a pig during pregnancy, on a farm,
in a way that prevents the pig from turning around freely. Basford, one of two
mass pork producers who used gestation crates in Florida, claimed that he had
to shut down his operation in 2003 after the passage of the Amendment. He stated
that he could no longer operate his business and compete with other producers
who were not restricted from using gestation crates. Basford sold for salvage
value all of his gestation and farrowing crates and other materials used in his
operation, stating that it would have cost him $600,000 to convert his hog
farming operation to conform to the new law.
The lower court concluded that a taking by the State occurred
when the law went into effect on November 5, 2008 and that Basford was entitled
to the fair market value of the improvements to his real property valued at the
time of the taking less the salvage value totaling $505,000 plus interest. The
appeals court affirmed when the taking occurred because the statute of
limitations did not begin to accrue until the Amendment went into effect in
2008, therefore not expiring before Basford filed suit. The appeals court also
affirmed the Final Judgment that an as-applied taking occurred because, as
shown through the lower court’s fact-finding process, there was a loss of value
as a result of the Amendment.
Written by Sarah Doyle - Research Assistant
The Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center
@PSUAgLawCenter
August 1, 2013
No comments:
Post a Comment