Showing posts with label Pink Slime. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pink Slime. Show all posts

Thursday, October 5, 2017

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—October 5, 2017

Written by M. Sean High—Staff Attorney
                 
The following information is an update of recent local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to agriculture:

Labor: House Chairman Announces Bill to Create New Agricultural Guestworker Program
On October 2, 2017, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) announced legislation designed to create a new agricultural guestworker program for American farmers and ranchers.  Referred to as the Ag Act, Chairman Goodlatte’s bill would replace the current H-2A guestworker program with a new H-2C guestworker program.  According to the Chairman’s summary of the bill, the H-2C guestworker program would better meet producer needs by making available 500,000 visas each year for both seasonal and year-round agricultural work.   

Nutrition Labeling: FDA Seeks to Extend Compliance Dates for Nutrition Facts Labeling
On October 2, 2017, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published notice in the Federal Register proposing extensions to the compliance dates for the Nutrition Facts and Supplement Facts label final rule and the Serving Size final rule (82 FR 45753).  For manufactures with $10 million or more in annual food sales, the proposed delay would extend the compliance date from July 26, 2018, to January 1, 2020.  For manufactures with fewer than $10 million in annual food sales, the proposed delay would extend the compliance date from July 26, 2018 to January 1, 2021.

Clean Water Act: Tyson Pleads Guilty to Violating Clean Water Act
On September 27, 2017, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that Tyson Poultry Inc. (Tyson) has pleaded guilty to criminal charges for violating the Clean Water Act.  The DOJ stated that the charges stemmed from the release of the liquid food supplement “Alimet” at the company’s slaughter and processing facility in Monett, Missouri.  The DOJ asserted that the Alimet discharge caused the death of approximately 108,000 fish.  According to the DOJ, the plea agreement requires Tyson to pay a criminal fine of $2 million and serve two years of probation.

Horse Racing: PDA Addresses Recently Enacted Horse Racing Regulations
On September 26, 2017, the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture (PDA) issued a press release regarding three recently enacted horse racing regulations addressing illegal performance enhancing drugs.  According to PDA, the regulations provide for increased penalties for repeat offenders, establish an out-of-competition testing program, and provide for horse ineligibility after a positive test.  PDA stated that with the enactment of the three regulations, significant consequences now exist for trainers, veterinarians and owners who choose to violate Pennsylvania’s horse racing laws.

Labor: Ben & Jerry’s Agrees to Improve Dairy Worker Conditions
On October 3, 2017, the New York Times reported that ice cream manufacturer Ben & Jerry’s has agreed to a program establishing labor standards for the Vermont dairy farms that supply the company with milk.  Entitled Milk With Dignity, the program mandates that dairy workers receive one day off a week and are paid at least the Vermont state minimum wage of $10.  According to the report, compliance with the program will be enforced through independent audits.

GMOs: Study Finds GM Soybean Oil Induces Less Obesity and Insulin Resistance
On October 2, 2017, Science Daily reported that a University of California, Riverside study found that the genetically modified (GM) soybean Plenish® induces less obesity and insulin resistance than conventional soybean oil.  Engineered to contain low levels of linoleic acid, Plenish® has a similar composition to olive oil.  While the study found less obesity and insulin resistance with Plenish®, the study did find that the GM soybean oil had the same effects on diabetes and fatty liver as those of conventional soybean oil.

Beef: BPI Establishes Fund for Workers Affected by “Pink Slime” Reporting
On September 28, 2017, Meat + Poultry reported that Beef Products Inc. (BPI) has established a $10 million fund to compensate workers that lost their jobs due to plant closures resulting from the negative reporting of BPI’s product Lean Finely Textured Beef.  According to the article, in 2012, ABC News published a series of reports that referred to BPI’s Lean Finely Textured Beef product as “pink slime”.  Subsequently, in 2012, BPI closed three production facilities and filed a defamation lawsuit against ABC News.  In June of 2017, the parties settled for an undisclosed amount.  The article stated that the fund will benefit 750 former workers.
                 
Pennsylvania Legislation
Environmental Resources and Energy (House)
  • HB 1486 legislation exempting “high tunnels” that meet certain parameters from any requirements under the Storm Water Act (reported out of committee, October 3, 2017)


Environmental Resources and Energy (Senate)
  • SB 917 legislation amending the Municipal Waste Planning, Recycling and Waste Reduction Act to expand the definition of “compost materials" to include “mushroom compost” (referred to committee, October 3, 2017)


Pennsylvania Actions and Notices
Department of Environmental Protection


Public Utility Commission


AgLaw HotLinks:


Listen to our new Agricultural Law Podcast by clicking here!

Follow us on Twitter at PSU Ag & Shale Law (@AgShaleLaw) to receive AgLaw HotLinks

Connect with us on Facebook! Every week we will post the CASL Ledger which details all our publications and activities from the week.

Stay informed with our monthly Agricultural Law Brief located here.


For a comprehensive summary of daily judicial, legislative, and regulatory developments in agriculture and food, visit The Ag & Food Law Blog.

Thursday, July 6, 2017

Agriculture Law Weekly Review - July 6, 2017

Written by Joseph Mooradian - Research Assistant

GMO Labeling: USDA Solicits Public Input On GMO Labeling

On July 29, 2016, legislation to establish the National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard was enacted by Congress. This standard will be established by the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS), who have recently called for responses to thirty questions on the subject, seeking comments no later than July 17, 2017. These questions upon which AMS seeks comment range from questions such as, “Should AMS consider more than one disclosure category?” to “How should AMS make public the summary of any examination, audit, or similar activity?” According to the 2016 legislation, the AMS standard must be established within two years of its enactment.

Antitrust: European Commission and Canadian Competition Bureau Clear Dow/DuPont Merger

On June 28, 2017, Dow and DuPont issued a joint update on their planned merger, which is due to close in August. The companies have met the conditions stipulated in the March 27, 2017, approval by the European Commission, bringing them within full approval from the E.U. This follows the June 22, 2017, approval by the U.S. Department of Justice, as well as being joined by approval from Canada’s Competition Bureau. All three of these key regulatory approvals required some divestment. Dow and DuPont’s statement reiterates its plans for a new three-company structure in the wake of the reorganization.

Food Disparagement: BPI Settles with ABC Over Food Disparagement Claim

On June 28, 2017, Beef Products Inc. (BPI) settled its lawsuit with ABC Television over ABC referring to BPI’s beef product as “pink slime” over three hundred times in 2012. The final amount of the settlement has not been disclosed, although according to Journal Star, BPI claimed losses of roughly $400 million in the five year period since 2012. South Dakota, where the suit took place, has food libel laws, making it one of 13 states where suits of libel or defamation over food are easier to pursue.

Biosecurity: Bill Addressing Agro-Terrorism Threat Signed Into Law

On June 30, 2017, President Trump signed H.R. 1238, the Securing our Agriculture and Food Act into law. The law empowers the Department of Homeland Security to defend agriculture systems from terrorism and “other high-consequence events,” through amendment of the Homeland Security Act of 2002.  According to Senator Claire McCaskill, who was a co-sponsor of the legislation, “We don’t always think of a terrorist attack as a deliberate, mass food contamination, or the danger a major disease outbreak could pose… This bill is an example of setting aside difference to work across the aisle to keep American families safe, and that’s the greatest responsibility I have.”

Soda Tax: Court Stays Implementation of Cook County Soda Tax

On June 30, 2017, Judge Daniel Kubasiak of the Cook County Circuit Court issued a temporary restraining order staying the county’s beverage tax, which was set to go into effect the next day. The bill as introduced featured a wide range of regulations, including a $0.01 per ounce tax on all “bottled sugar-sweetened beverages, syrups, or powders,” as well as requiring all distributors of such items to acquire a permit. According to Food Chemical News, the lawsuit seeking to stay the law, brought by the Illinois Retail Merchants Association, states that the law, “violates the uniformity clause of the Illinois Constitution and is impermissibly vague.” A further hearing is scheduled on July 12, to determine the future of the measure’s legality.

AgLaw HotLinks:


Follow us on Twitter at Ag & Shale Law (@AgShaleLaw) to receive AgLaw HotLinks.

Connect with us on Facebook! Every week we will post the CASL Ledger which details all our publications and activities from the week.

Stay informed with our monthly Agricultural Law Brief located here.


For a comprehensive summary of daily judicial, legislative, and regulatory developments in agriculture and food, visit The Ag & Food Law Blog.

Thursday, April 13, 2017

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—April 13, 2017

Written by M. Sean High – Staff Attorney

The following information is an update of recent, local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to agriculture:

Right to Farm: PA Court Rules on Application and Storage of Wastewater
On April 4, 2017, the Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled on a case involving a neighbor nuisance suit and the Pennsylvania Right to Farm (RTF) law (Branton v. Nicholas Meat, LLC, 2017 PA Super 88 No. 536 MDA 2016).  The court determined that so long as an agricultural operation “substantially complies with relevant federal, state, and local laws” the agricultural operation still meets RTF’s “lawful” requirement.  Accordingly, the court stated that “a lawful use is not rendered unlawful simply because an owner may have been cited for an infraction for noncompliance in connection with the use.” Additionally, the court held that both the application and storage of food processing waste are normal agricultural operations under RTF.  The court determined, however, that the construction of a 2,400,000 gallon storage tank was a “substantial change” to the agricultural operation.  As a result, because the neighbors brought suit within one year of the change, the case was not barred under RTF.

Packers and Stockyards Act: GIPSA Rule Enforcement is Delayed Six Months  
On April 12, 2017, the Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA) published notice in the Federal Register that the agency “is delaying the effective date of the rule published on December 20, 2016, for an additional six months to October 19, 2017” (82 FR 17531).  According to GIPSA, the “rule addresses the scope of sections 202(a) and (b) of the Packers and Stockyards Act, 1921” (81 FR 92566).  GIPSA stated that the delay in the rule’s effective date is “in response to a comment received from a national general farm organization that requested an extension of time and to allow time for further consideration by USDA.”

Litigation: “Pink Slime” Case Moves to Trial
On April 5, 2017, Reuters reported that “ABC Broadcasting has lost a last-ditch bid before South Dakota’s highest court to avoid a trial in a beef producer’s $5.7 billion defamation case over reports about a product that critics call ‘pink slime.’” According to Reuters, Beef Products Inc. (BPI) produces “[l]ean, finely textured beef [which] is made from beef chunks, including trimmings and exposed to tiny bursts of ammonium hydroxide to kill bacteria.”  BPI’s suit alleges that the company was damaged when ABC referred to “BPI’s “lean finely textured beef” product as "pink slime."  Reuters stated that with the recent ruling, the trial is scheduled to begin on June 5, 2017.

Biosecurity: Public Meetings Scheduled Regarding Animal Disease Traceability
On April 3, 2017, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) announced that the agency will hold “a series of public meetings to receive input on the current Animal Disease Traceability (ADT) system.” According to APHIS, “[t]he meetings will allow APHIS to hear from the public about the successes and challenges of the current ADT framework, specifically for traceability in cattle and bison.”  The meetings are scheduled for the following dates and locations:
April 11: Oklahoma City, OK
April 13: Riverdale, MD
April 20: Nashville, TN
May 2: Bloomington, MN
May 4: Denver, CO
May 11: Rancho Cordova, CA
May 24: Billings, MT  

Federal Administrative Actions and Notices:
Agricultural Department

Environmental Protection Agency

Farm Credit

Food & Drug Administration

Pennsylvania Administrative Actions and Notices:
Department of Environmental Protection

Pennsylvania Legislation:
Senate Agricultural and Rural Affairs
SB 567: Controlled Plant and Noxious Weed Act

AgLaw HotLinks:

Follow us on Twitter at PSU Ag & Shale Law (@AgShaleLaw) to receive AgLaw HotLinks

Connect with us on Facebook! Every week we will post the CASL Ledger which details all our publications and activities from the week.


Stay informed with our monthly Agricultural Law Brief located here

Thursday, October 24, 2013

BPI Lawsuit Against ABC News Over “Pink Slime” to Proceed in December

The Beef Products Inc. (BPI) suit against ABC News will proceed with oral arguments on December 17, 2013 in South Dakota state court. The suit resulted from network’s use of the term “pink slime” to describe Lean Finely Textured Beef (LFTB), a beef product made by BPI. BPI brings the claim under South Dakota’s defamation and food disparagement laws, arguing that ABC misled consumers to believe that LFTB is unhealthy and unsafe, resulting in the closure of three of four BPI plants and layoffs of over 700 employees. BPI is seeking 1.2 billion dollars in damages. ABC is arguing that it did not knowingly disparage BPI or LFTB.

In June of 2013, the case was remanded from federal court to state court, where the suit was originally filed in October of 2012.


For more information about the ongoing lawsuit, please see Justia.com.

Written by Sarah L. Doyle - Research Assistant
The Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center
@PSUAgLawCenter
October 24, 2013