Showing posts with label Right to Farm. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Right to Farm. Show all posts

Thursday, December 20, 2018

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—December 20, 2018


Written by:
M. Sean High (Staff Attorney) and Deanna Smith (Research Assistant)
                 
The following information is an update of recent local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to agriculture:

Publication Note: The Agricultural Law Weekly Review will not be published during the holiday week of December 24-28.  The next scheduled publication date will be January 3, 2019.

Right to Farm Laws: Judge Denies Punitive Damages in Latest Hog Farm Nuisance Lawsuit
On December 13, 2018, The News & Observer reported that a federal district judge has denied punitive damages sought against hog producer Murphy-Brown, LLC regarding nuisance litigation in North Carolina.  This lawsuit centers around Sholar Farms, a swine operation in Sampson County, North Carolina, and eight neighbors who alleged that the operation created a nuisance due to foul odors and excessive noise.  The jury found in favor of the plaintiff’s and awarded between $100 and $75,000 in compensation for the harm of living near the hog farm.  While the plaintiff’s counsel further argued for punitive damages, presiding judge David Faber determined there was not enough evidence in this case to pursue the additional damages.

National Agricultural Policy: USDA’s New Program for High Speed Internet in Rural America
On Thursday, December 13, 2018, Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue announced that the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) is offering internet service providers, telecommunications companies, municipalities, rural electric cooperatives and utilities, up to $600 million in loans and grants to help build high speed broadband infrastructure throughout rural America.  Secretary Perdue stated that “high speed internet e-Connectivity is a necessity, not an amenity, vital for the quality of life and economic opportunity.” Approximately $200M of the funds will be allocated for grants, $200M for loan and grant combinations, and $200M for low-interest loans.  For more information on application deadlines see page 64315 of the December 14, 2018 Federal Register.  This funding can be applied for through the USDA’s new ReConnect Program and is administered primarily under the USDA’s Rural Development Agency.

Water Quality: Ohio Legislative Committee Rejects Revisions to State’s Watershed Rule
On December 10, 2018, an Ohio legislative committee voted to send watershed rule revisions back to the state’s department of agriculture for further consideration.  Known as the “watersheds in distress” rules, the revisions are an attempt by the Ohio Department of Agriculture (ODA) to deal with issues related to nutrient management and water quality.  The legislative committee, called the Joint Committee on Agency Rule Review, determined by a vote of 8 – 1 that ODA should revise and refile the rules for when the committee next meets on January 22, 2019.  For a more in-depth analysis of the ruling, please see Peggy Kirk Hall’s recent article entitled: “’Watersheds in distress’ rules don’t clear the JCARR hurdle”

International Trade: USDA Announces Second Round of Trade Mitigation Payments for Farmers
On December 17, 2018, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) announced a second round of trade mitigation payments for farmers adversely affected by trade retaliation by foreign nations.  Accordingly, farmers that produce almonds, cotton, corn, milk, hogs, soybeans, sorghum, fresh sweet cherries, and wheat will now be eligible to receive Market Facilitation Program payments for the second half of their 2018 production.  According to USDA Secretary Sonny Perdue, payments are intended to help affected producers deal with short-term cash flow issues.  Interested producers can receive more information at their local USDA Farm Service Agency office or visit www.farmers.gov.

Antibiotic Use: McDonald’s Announces New Antibiotic Policy for Beef
On December 11, 2018, McDonald’s announced a new policy intended to reduce antibiotics in the beef supplied to the food company.  According to McDonald’s, antibiotic resistance poses a recognized threat to global health, food security, and development.  As a result, the company hopes to cause a reduction in the use of antibiotics in beef production through:

  • Partnering with producers that supply beef in the company’s top 10 beef sourcing markets to measure and understand current antibiotic usage;
  • By the end of 2020, establishing targets to reduce medically important antibiotics in the company’s top 10 beef sourcing markets; and
  • Beginning in 2022, reporting progress made in reducing antibiotic usage in the company’s top 10 beef sourcing markets.

From National Ag Law Experts:
“2018 Ag Law Year in Review”,  Tiffany Dowell Lashmet, Texas Agricultural Law Blog (December 17, 2018)
“Congress Sends 2018 Farm Bill to President”, Kristine A. Tidgren, The Ag Docket – Iowa State University Center for Agricultural Law and Taxation (December 15, 2018)
“Ohio Agricultural Law Blog--We bring you tidings of gifts and tax implications in this season of giving”, Evin Bachelor, Ag Law Blog – Agricultural Law & Taxation – Ohio State University Extension (December 7, 2018)  

Pennsylvania Actions and Notices:
Department of Environmental Protection

Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture:

Penn State Research:

AgLaw HotLinks:

Stay Informed:
Listen to our weekly Agricultural Law Podcast
Read our monthly Agricultural Law Brief newsletter     
Follow us on Twitter at PSU Ag & Shale Law (@AgShaleLaw) to receive daily AgLaw HotLinks
Connect with us on Facebook to view our weekly CASL Ledger detailing Center publications and activities
Visit The Ag & Food Law Blog for a comprehensive summary of daily judicial, legislative, and regulatory developments in agriculture and food

Thursday, November 8, 2018

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—November 8, 2018

Written by: Ross H. Pifer (Director), M. Sean High (Staff Attorney), Jacqueline Schweichler (Staff Attorney), and Deanna Smith (Research Assistant)
                 
The following information is an update of recent local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to agriculture:

Air Quality: EPA Proposes Reporting Exemption for Air Emissions from Animal Waste
On October 30, 2018, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released a proposed rule to amend the notification requirements for agricultural facilities under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA).  EPCRA imposes reporting obligations upon the owners and operators of certain facilities relating to the storage, use, and release of hazardous substances (42 U.S.C. §11004).  The proposed rule amends the emergency release notification regulation to exempt reporting for air emissions from animal waste at farms.  This change has been implemented by adding definitions for "farm" and "animal waste" to the regulation.  The creation of the agricultural exemption in the proposed rule is intended to maintain consistency with the regulations of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).  On March 23, 2018, legislation was enacted to provide an agricultural exemption for reporting air emissions from animal waste under CERCLA (Fair Agricultural Reporting Method Act, Pub. L. No. 115-141).  According to EPA, CERCLA and EPCRA are interrelated environmental laws with some portions of EPCRA depending upon corresponding CERCLA requirements.  In establishing identical agricultural exemptions to the reporting requirements under each statute, EPA believes that it has acted "in furtherance of the underlying purpose of this statutory framework." Public comments on the proposed rule are due on or before 30 days after publication of the proposed rule in the Federal Register.

Pesticides: EPA Extends Dicamba Registration for “Over-the-Top” Use
On October 31, 2018, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced that the registration of dicamba for “over-the-top” use on genetically engineered cotton and soybeans has been extended for two years.  The term “over-the-top” use refers to when application of a pesticide is made to a growing plant.  As part of the two-year extension, EPA has also imposed new labeling requirements and restrictions on applicable dicamba products.  According to EPA Acting Administrator Andrew Wheeler, the agency recognizes “that dicamba is a valuable pest control tool for America’s farmers.” Mr. Wheeler further stated that “[b]y extending the registration for another two years with important new label updates that place additional restrictions on the product, we are providing certainty to all stakeholders for the upcoming growing season.” Following the EPA action, U.S. farmers may continue to use the dicamba products until December 20, 2020. 

FSMA: FDA Issues Guidance Regarding Mandatory Food Recalls
On November 6, 2018, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published notice in the Federal Register that the agency has issued a final guidance document entitled: Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff: Questions and Answers Regarding Mandatory Food Recalls (83 FR 55551).  According to FDA, the guidance is intended to provide industry with information regarding the implementation of the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act’s (FSMA) mandatory food recall provisions.  FDA stated that the guidance provides answers to potential questions which may arise from the implementation of the mandatory food recall provisions and expresses FDA’s current thoughts on the topic.

Right to Farm Laws: Appeals Court Rules against Gag Order for North Carolina Swine Farm Nuisance Lawsuit 
On October 31, 2018, Feedstuffs reported that the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals struck down a gag order imposed by a trial judge in a nuisance lawsuit against a North Carolina swine operation.  Under a gag order, a judge forbids the parties, attorneys, and witnesses from publicly discussing the facts of a case.  According to the article, the defendant in the nuisance suit—Murphy-Brown LLC—asserted that the gag order was an unconstitutional violation of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.  The appeals court unanimously agreed and held that the gag order had prevented the parties from exercising their First Amendment right.  The appeals court further asserted that the “gag order has already inflicted serious harm on parties, advocates and potential witnesses alike…and has muted political engagement on a contested issue of great public and private consequence.” 

International Trade: Canada Announces Working Groups for Poultry, Egg, and Dairy Sectors
On October 29, 2018, the Government of Canada published a news release announcing the formation of new working groups in the poultry and egg sectors, as well as among dairy farmers and processors.  These working groups are meant to help develop adjustment strategies for Canadian farmers and processors in response to the new United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).  Canada’s Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food, Lawrence MacAulay, said that these groups will “ensure the voices of the hardworking men and women who are building and growing our farm businesses are heard and reflected.”  

From National Ag Law Experts:
“Ohio Agricultural Law Blog--The Ag Law Harvest,”  Evin Bachelor and Ellen Essman, Ohio State University Extension (November 2, 2018)
“State’s Public Utility Law Preempted Local Zoning and Planning Requirements for Siting a Solar Energy Farm”, Paul Goeringer, Maryland Risk Management Education Blog (November 7, 2018)
“American Agricultural Law Association Conference Review”, Tiffany Dowell Lashmet, Texas Agricultural Law Blog, Texas A&M AgriLife Extension (November 5, 2018)   

Pennsylvania Actions and Notices:
Game Commission: Notices

Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture

Penn State Research:
        
AgLaw HotLinks:

Stay Informed:
Listen to our weekly Agricultural Law Podcast
Read our monthly Agricultural Law Brief newsletter     
Follow us on Twitter at PSU Ag & Shale Law (@AgShaleLaw) to receive daily AgLaw HotLinks
Connect with us on Facebook to view our weekly CASL Ledger detailing Center publications and activities

Thursday, July 5, 2018

Agricultural Law Weekly Review - July 5, 2018


Written by:
Jackie Schweichler - Education Programs Coordinator

The following information is an update of recent local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to agriculture.

Farm Bill: U.S. Senate Agrees to Latest Amendments in 2018 Farm Bill
On June 28, 2018, the U.S. Senate voted to pass its latest version of the 2018 Farm Bill with a vote of 86 to 11. Earlier, on June 21, 2018, the House of Representatives passed H.R.2, and the latest Senate action substantially amended H.R.2, including changing the name of the bill from the Agriculture and Nutrition Act of 2018 to the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018.  Before the bill can go to a final vote, Congress must go conference to resolve legislative differences between the House and Senate versions of the bill. The 2018 Farm Bill provides updates and changes to Department of Agriculture programs including those in conservation, nutrition assistance, farm credit, rural development, crop insurance, and more.

Biofuels: EPA Releases Proposed Volume Requirements for Renewable Fuels
On June 26, 2018, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released proposed volume requirements for the Renewable Fuel Standard Program. The EPA sets renewable fuel percentage standards each year for cellulosic biofuel, biomass-based diesel, advanced biofuel, and total renewable fuel as applied to gasoline and diesel transportation fuel. Part of the proposed volume requirements would increase the 2019 renewable fuel blending mandate to 19.88 billion gallons, an increase of 3 percent from 2018. EPA also plans to increase advanced biofuel requirements to 4.88 billion gallons and cellulosic biofuel to 381 million gallons. EPA will hold a public hearing for the proposed rule on July 18th and will accept public comment until August 17, 2018.

Right to Farm Laws: North Carolina Legislature Overrides Governor Veto to Approve Changes to Right to Farm Law
On June 27, 2018, the North Carolina House voted to override the governor’s veto of SB 711 which, now passed, will provide protections to farmers against nuisance lawsuits. The governor vetoed the bill on June 25th and the Senate voted to override the veto on June 26th. SB 711 adds language to the North Carolina Farm Act of 2018 to shield farmers who are operating in good faith from nuisance lawsuits that are filed after the operation has been established. The changes to the law include a requirement that counties must have land records that provide notice where a tract of land is located within half a mile from a poultry, swine, or dairy operation. The law prohibits any nuisance action from being filed against an agricultural operation unless the plaintiff’s property is directly affected, the affected property is within a one-half mile of the operation, AND the action is filed within one year of the establishment of the operation or within one year of the operation undergoing a fundamental change.

Antimicrobial Use: FDA Releases Guidance on Antimicrobial Animal Drug Sale Rule
On June 28, 2018, the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) released a new guidance document regarding antimicrobial animal drug sales for small business entities. The guidance document, Antimicrobial Animal Drug Sales and Distribution Reporting Small Entity Compliance Guide, is intended to help small businesses understand and comply with “reporting regulations for antimicrobial animal drug sales and distribution information.” The guidance document was prepared following the 2016 publication of the final rule, Antimicrobial Animal Drug Sales and Distribution. The rule requires that sponsors of approved antimicrobial animal drug products must submit an annual report on the amount that is sold or distributed for use.

Right to Farm Laws: Court Awards $25 Million in Second Nuisance Lawsuit Against Hog Operation
On June 29, 2018, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina awarded $25 million to plaintiffs in a nuisance lawsuit filed against Smithfield Foods, according to NewsObserver (McGowan v. Murphy-Brown, LLC, No. 7:14-CV-182-BR). The plaintiffs are neighboring landowners who complained of flies, stench, rumbling trucks and other problems associated with living next to a hog farm. This is the second in a series of recent lawsuits filed against Smithfield Foods, the world’s largest pork processor and hog producer. In April, a jury awarded $50 million in damages to ten neighbors of another Smithfield hog operation (McKiver et al v. Murphy-Brown, LLC, 7:2014cv00180). The damages award in the first case has since been reduced to $3.25 million due to North Carolina’s statutory cap on punitive damages.

From National Ag Law Experts:
Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy, Uprooted Episode 38: Chatting with the IATP Board (June 27, 2018)
Tiffany Dowell Lashmet, James v. Young: Are Landowners Liable for Horse Riding Injury to Child?, Texas Agriculture Law (July 2, 2018)

Pennsylvania Notices
Environmental Quality Board Meeting Cancellation, the Board meeting for July 17th is cancelled; the next regular meeting will be August 21, 2018 (June 30, 2018)

Pennsylvania Legislation
HB 2121 Commonwealth Budget 2018-2019 (signed by Governor, June 22, 2018)

Follow us on Twitter at PSU Ag & Shale Law (@AgShaleLaw) to receive AgLaw HotLinks

Stay Informed:
Listen to our weekly Agricultural Law Podcast
Read our monthly Agricultural Law Brief newsletter     
Follow us on Twitter at PSU Ag & Shale Law (@AgShaleLaw) to receive daily AgLaw HotLinks
Connect with us on Facebook to view our weekly CASL Ledger detailing Center publications and activities
Visit The Ag & Food Law Blog for a comprehensive summary of daily judicial, legislative, and regulatory developments in agriculture and food

Thursday, May 31, 2018

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—May 31, 2018


Written by: M. Sean High—Staff Attorney
                 
The following information is an update of recent local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to agriculture:

Right to Farm Laws: Neighbors Appeal to Pennsylvania Supreme Court Regarding Swine Operation
On April 29, 2018, neighbors filed petitions with the Pennsylvania Supreme Court seeking review of a lower court decision in favor of a Pennsylvania swine operation (296 MAL 2018) (297 MAL 2018).  The petitions follow a March 29, 2018, Superior Court of Pennsylvania determination that a nuisance suit brought against a swine operation’s application of liquid swine manure was barred under Pennsylvania's right to farm law (Burlingame, J. v. Dagostin, P., No. 799 MDA 2017).  For more information concerning the Superior Court’s ruling, see the Penn State Agricultural Law Weekly Review—April 5, 2018.

Agricultural Labor: U.S. Secretaries Release Joint Cabinet Statement Regarding H-2A Program
On May 24, 2018, U.S. Secretary of Labor Alexander Acosta, U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen Nielsen, U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue, and U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo issued a joint cabinet statement concerning the H-2A temporary agricultural visa program.  According to the statement, the agencies are working together to modernize the H-2A temporary agricultural visa program to better meet the labor needs of the American farmer.  The secretaries asserted that their goal is to reduce the complexity of the regulations currently governing the program.  Additionally, the secretaries stated that they intend to provide farmers with incentives to use the voluntary E-Verify online system to confirm an employee’s eligibility to work in the U.S.

FSMA: FDA Issues FSMA Guidance for Food Facilities
On May 29, 2018, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published notice in the Federal Register of industry guidance entitled: Registration of Food Facilities: What You Need To Know About the FDA Regulation—Small Entity Compliance Guide (83 FR 24479).  Previously, on July 14, 2016, FDA published a final rule, entitled: Amendments to Registration of Food Facilities (81 FR 45912).  Under the July 14, 2016, final rule, food facility registration regulations were amended to reflect FDA Food Safety Modernization Act amendments to section 415 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.  FDA stated that the purpose of the industry guidance is to help small entities comply with the food facility registration changes that resulted from the July 14, 2016 final rule.

Animal Welfare: APHIS Will Not Recognize Third-Party Inspections and Certifications to Determine Frequency of Animal Welfare Inspections
On May 25, 2018, The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) announced that the agency will not establish criteria that recognize third-party inspection and certification programs used for determining the frequency of APHIS inspections under the Animal Welfare Act (AWA).  APHIS stated that the agency arrived at the decision following a series of public listening sessions and public comments submitted through the Federal Register.  According to APHIS, the “vast majority” of stakeholders providing response were not in favor of establishing a program that recognized third party inspections and certifications when determining the frequency of AWA inspections.  As a result, APHIS stated that when determining frequency of AWA inspections, the agency will continue to utilize its current risk-based inspection system.     

Air Quality: Court Issues Mandate for CERCLA/EPCRA Reporting [Update to article appearing in May 24, 2018, Agricultural Law Weekly Review]
On May 2, 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit issued a mandate vacating a 2008 final rule that provided agricultural exemptions for reporting air emissions under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA).  Under the 2008 final rule, all agricultural operations were provided a complete exemption from CERCLA reporting requirements.  While the 2008 final rule required certain concentrated animal feeding operations to report air emissions under EPCRA, the regulation exempted all other agricultural operations from EPCRA reporting requirements.  Subsequently, on April 11, 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit vacated the 2008 final rule.  Following the court’s ruling, on March 23, 2018, President Donald Trump signed into law the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018 (Omnibus Bill) which contained language exempting agricultural operations from CERCLA air emission reporting requirements (Public Law No: 115-141).  Additionally, because the Omnibus Bill excluded the reporting of air emissions from animal waste under CERCLA, EPA stated that “these releases fall out of the reporting requirements of EPCRA section 304.” (See EPA document entitled: How does the Fair Agricultural Reporting Method (FARM) Act impact reporting of air emissions from animal waste under CERCLA Section 103 and EPCRA Section 304?).  As a result, despite the May 2, 2018, court mandate, agricultural operations “do not need to report air emissions from animal waste at farms under either CERCLA or EPCRA.”

From National Ag Law Experts:
  • Exempt Wells & Agriculture, Jesse J. Richardson, Jr. and Iris Aloi, West Virginia University College of Law, an agricultural law research publication by the National Agricultural and Food Law Consortium, May 18, 2017
  • Water Rights Tables, Jesse J. Richardson, Jr. and Iris Aloi, West Virginia University College of Law, an agricultural law research publication by the National Agricultural and Food Law Consortium, May 18, 2017


Pennsylvania Actions and Notices:
Department of Agriculture

Milk Marketing Board

State Conservation Commission


Penn State Research and Education


AgLaw HotLinks:


Stay Informed:


Thursday, May 3, 2018

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—May 3, 2018


Written by: M. Sean High—Staff Attorney
                 
The following information is an update of recent local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to agriculture:

Right to Farm Laws: Jury Awards Over $50 Million in Hog Nuisance Case
On April 26, 2018, a jury in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina issued $50,750,000 in damages as a result of manure management practices at a North Carolina hog operation (McKiver v Murphy-Brown LLC, No. 7:14-CV-180-BR).  The case involved neighbor complaints regarding odors that emanated from an agricultural operation that had contracted with pork producer Murphy Brown LLC to raise roughly 15,000 hogs.  The jury determined that each of the ten neighbor plaintiffs in the case was entitled to $75,000 in damages as well as $5,000,000 in punitive damages.  The ruling is the first of twenty-six nuisance cases which have recently been brought against Murphy-Brown LLC, a subsidiary of Smithfield Foods.

Biotechnology: FDA Approves Indiana AquaBounty Salmon Facility
On April 26, 2018, The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced approval of an application by AquaBounty Technologies, Inc. to raise genetically engineered (GE) salmon at a land-based facility near Albany, Indiana.  The company, however, is unable to begin operations at the Indiana facility due to current law prohibiting the importation of the eggs necessary to produce GE salmon.  Accordingly, under Import Alert 99-40, until labeling guidelines have been established, FDA may not permit into interstate commerce food that contains GE salmon.  FDA stated that it considers salmon eggs to meet the definition of food.

Industrial Hemp/Cannabis: Hemp Related Businesses Must Demonstrate they are Legal before Being Eligible for SBA Loans
On April 3, 2018, U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) issued a policy notice clarifying that a hemp-related business may be eligible to receive SBA financial assistance.  The notice stated that “businesses engaged in any activity that is illegal under federal, state or local law are ineligible for SBA financial assistance.” As a result, the notice asserted that both direct and indirect marijuana businesses are considered ineligible for SBA financial assistance. A hemp-related business, however, may be eligible if the business can demonstrated that its practices and products are legal under federal and state law.  According to the notice, “[e]xamples of legal hemp products include paper, clothing and rope.”

Biofuels: Japan Allows Importation of U.S. Corn-Based Ethanol
On April 17, 2018, the U.S. Grains Council (USGC) announced that Japan’s biofuel policy will now permit the importation of ETBE produced from U.S. corn-based ethanol.  According to USGC, prior to the recent change, Japan allowed only sugarcane-based ethanol for the production of the gasoline additive ETBE.  As a result of Japan’s change in policy, U.S. corn-based ethanol is now authorized to supply up to 44% of the country’s anticipated 217 million gallon demand of ethanol used to produce ETBE.

Food Policy: USDA Issues Revisions and Clarifications for the Processing of Donated Foods
On May 1, 2018, U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food and Nutrition Service published notice in the Federal Register of a final rule changing the requirements for the processing of donated foods (83 FR 18913).  Under the new rule: (1) multi-State processors must now enter into National Processing Agreements in order to process donated foods into end products and (2) processors may now substitute certain commercially purchased beef and pork for donated beef and pork.  The new rule, which also attempts to streamline and modernize oversight of inventories of donated foods, goes into effect July 2, 2018.

National Ag Law Experts:

Pennsylvania Legislation:
Agriculture and Rural Affairs (H)
  • HB 2169 Legislation amending the Dog Law regarding attacks (referred to committee April 24, 2018)
  • SB 792 Legislation regarding labeling requirements for lawn fertilizer (public hearing scheduled June 5, 2018)

Pennsylvania Actions and Notices:
Milk Marketing Board

State Conservation Commission

AgLaw HotLinks:

Stay Informed:


Thursday, April 12, 2018

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—April 12, 2018


Written by: M. Sean High—Staff Attorney
                 
The following information is an update of recent local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to agriculture:

Antitrust: U.S. Approves Bayer Monsanto Merger
On April 11, 2018, Fortune reported that the U.S. Justice Department has approved Bayer AG’s $62.5 billion acquisition of Monsanto Co.  The anticipated merger will result in a company that controls over one quarter of the world’s seed and pesticide market.  To gain U.S. approval, Fortune stated that Bayer will sell certain assets to its German competitor BASF.  These assets “include the company’s soybean and cottonseed businesses as well as its glufosinate weedkiller, which is a direct competitor to Roundup, a central element of Monsanto’s business.”

Right to Farm Laws: Alaska Supreme Court Rules Storage Lagoons not protected Under Right to Farm Law
On April 6, 2018, the Supreme Court of Alaska held that a farmer’s septage storage lagoons were not protected by the state’s Right to Farm Act (RTFA) (Riddle v. Lanser, Supreme Court No. 7235 – April 6, 2018).  Under Alaska’s RTFA, “an agricultural facility or an agricultural operation at an agricultural facility used for commercial purposes cannot become a nuisance based on changes in surroundings if it was not a nuisance when it started” (AS 09.45.235(a)).  The court held that the RTFA did not apply because the farmer’s septage lagoons were not used as part of the farmer’s agricultural operation.  Instead, the lagoons were used to store septage from the farmer’s separate septic pumping and storing business.  The court held that even if the storage lagoons eventually became part of the agricultural operation, the lagoons were not used, or intended to be used, “in any farming capacity until after the lagoons had already become a nuisance.”

Agricultural Labor: ICE Raids Tennessee Meat-Processing Facility
On April 6, 2018, the Washington Post reported that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials arrested 97 immigrants at a meat-processing facility in Tennessee.  According to an ICE spokesperson, all 97 immigrants were arrested under suspicion of being in the country illegally.  The report stated that federal agents began investigating the meat-processing facility after bank employees noticed the company making large weekly withdraws of cash.  Accordingly, since 2008, the meat-processing facility’s total weekly cash withdraws have exceeded $25 million.  

Dairy Policy: Agriculture Department Asks Pennsylvania Milk Marketing Board to Consider Reforms
On April 5, 2018, the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture (PDA) announced it has requested that the Pennsylvania Milk Marketing Board consider solutions to challenges currently faced by the Commonwealth’s dairy industry.  According to PDA, over the last two years, Pennsylvania dairy producers have experienced declining milk prices due to “sustained pressures on domestic and international markets, declining fluid milk consumption, and growing production levels.” In an effort to help these struggling producers, PDA stated that a formal petition has been submitted to the Milk Marketing Board requesting a hearing to consider potential reforms.

Farmland Preservation: Rhode Island Announces Farmland Purchase Program
On April 4, 2018, the Associated Press reported that Rhode Island will begin a program designed to help new farmers purchase farmland.  According to the report, the state will use farmland preservation funds to purchase farms at full appraised value; taking into consideration the land’s value if developed.  Following purchase, Rhode Island will then sell the land to new farmers at a price based on the land’s appraised agricultural value.  Land purchased through the program must remain in farming.    

National Ag Law Experts:

 Pennsylvania Case Law:

Pennsylvania Legislation:
Agriculture and Rural Affairs (S)
  • SB 1076  Legislation to expand and increase the Farmers’ Market Development Program (referred to committee April 6, 2018)

 Pennsylvania Actions and Notices:
Independent Regulatory Review Commission

 AgLaw HotLinks:

Stay Informed:
Listen to our weekly Agricultural Law Podcast
Read our monthly Agricultural Law Brief newsletter     
Follow us on Twitter at PSU Ag & Shale Law (@AgShaleLaw) to receive daily AgLaw HotLinks
Connect with us on Facebook to view our weekly CASL Ledger detailing Center publications and activities
Visit The Ag & Food Law Blog for a comprehensive summary of daily judicial, legislative, and regulatory developments in agriculture and food